Sykes Elder Law Attorneys Pittsburgh, PA


When NOT to file a Medicaid application

There is a subtle but important distinction between the Medicaid look-back rule and the ineligibility rule while the look-back period is limited to five years, the ineligibility period is not.

Think about that.

If you file a Medicaid application, the state asks you to reveal any transfers of assets in the past five years. Any transfers made before that won’t count. So you might think that any transfers you have made shouldn’t make you ineligible for benefits beyond five years. But here is the tricky thing: the ineligibility period is unlimited.

Here is an example of how these two rules work.

Madge has modest means, but the vacation house her father left to her has greatly increased in value over the years. In February of 2007, when the property was appraised at $650,000, she transferred title to her three children. Since she spent every summer there with her children when they were young, Madge wanted to keep it in the family.

Now in January of 2012 she enters a nursing home. The value of her assets is such that she could qualify for Medicaid benefits to pay for her care in a month or two.

Her nursing home has a policy of routinely filing an application for every new resident that transfers from a hospital, as Madge did. The nursing home, understandably, wants to make sure that every resident who qualifies for benefits gets approved as soon as possible so that the nursing home can continue to get paid.

But look at Question 10 on the Pennsylvania’s Medicaid application:

Within the past 60 months, have you or your spouse closed, given away, sold or transferred any assets such as: a home, land, personal property, life insurance policies, annuities, bank accounts, certificates of deposit, stocks, IRA, bonds or a right to income?

If her application is filed in January, Madge must answer “yes” and list the transfer of title to her children.

The result? The state finds Madge ineligible for Medicaid benefits for 80 months, or more than 6 ½ years! (The ineligibility period comes from a formula based on the value of the property transferred: $650,000 ÷ $8,112.13 = 80.13.) Madge may have to have her children transfer the house back to her, sell it, and spend down much of the proceeds.

The sad part is that Madge wasn’t even eligible for benefits until March. Had she waited until then to file her application, the transfer of title to her children would not have counted because it would have occurred more than five years before.

So if you have made sizeable transfers of your assets, be careful about when you file a Medicaid application. Better planning can help you achieve your estate planning goals.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Medicaid Planning | Comments Off

How to calculate a Medicaid ineligibility period

You may have heard that a Medicaid applicant becomes ineligible for benefits as a result of giving away assets.

But what are the details?

First let me give you the rule, then we’ll examine the parts.

Rule:  A Medicaid applicant will be found ineligible for benefits as a result gifts made during the look-back period. Calculation of the length of the ineligibility period (also called “penalty period”) depends on the amount of total gifts. That period begins to run when the applicant is otherwise eligible for benefits.

Gifts. If you’re a Medicaid applicant, the rules allow you to spend your money as long as you can show you received goods or services at a fair value in return. What gets penalized is a gift – that is, a transfer of assets for less than fair market value. Pennsylvania regulations define fair market value as the “price which property can be expected to sell for on the open market or would have been expected to sell for on the open market in the geographic area in which the property is located.” 55 Pa. Code §178.2.

Some people deed a house to one of their children for $1. If the house could be sold for $100,000, then Medicaid rules would count that transfer as a gift of $99,999.

Currently in Pennsylvania, no penalty period applies if total gifts in a calendar month were $500 or less. 62 P.S. § 441.5(a).

Some transfers are exempt from penalty, and therefore do not result in any penalty.

Look-back period. The rule applies only to gifts made during the look-back period, which you can read about here. Gifts made before don’t count.

Calculation. To calculate the period of ineligibility in Pennsylvania, the Department of Public Welfare divides the fair market value of the transferred property by the state’s penalty divisor (currently $266.70 per day, or $8,112.13 per month), a figure based upon the average statewide cost of nursing home care. Partial months are counted, but partial days are not. 

For example, if an applicant gave his son $30,000 during the look-back period, then the penalty period will be calculated to be 112 days ($30,000 ÷ $266.70 = 112.49, rounded down to 112).

Other states similarly divide the gifted amount by a regional penalty divisor to calculate the days of ineligibility, but the amount of the penalty divisor varies.

When the penalty begins.  The penalty period begins running when the transfer is made, or the date when the applicant would otherwise be eligible for benefits, whichever is later. For example, if an applicant gives his grandson $30,000 for college today, then applies for benefits four years from now, after suffering a stroke and spending down his other resources, the 112-day period of ineligibility will begin at the time of application.

But if a currently eligible Medicaid recipient deeds away his house today, the period of ineligibility would begin running today.

The take-away. Knowing the details of the ineligibility rules helps potential applicants make better planning decisions and (hopefully) avoid future ineligibility problems.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Medicaid Planning | Comments Off

What is the Medicaid look-back period?

An applicant for Medicaid must report transfers of assets made in the five years (60 months) prior to applying.

This period of time is called the “look-back” period. Here are the basics of how it works in Pennsylvania.

When is it? In most cases, it’s the 60 months prior to making a Medicaid application. In Pennsylvania, caseworkers go by the date when the applicant signed the application.

Was the look-back period always 5 years? No. The look-back period used to be only 36 months for transfers made to an individual. Under the federal Deficit Reduction Act, adopted in February of 2006, the look-back period for such transfers gradually increased to 60 months between February 2009 and February 2011. For transfers made to a trust, the look-back period has long been 60 months.

What has to be reported? Pennsylvania’s current Medicaid application for long term care contains the following questions:

Within the past 60 months, have you or your spouse closed, given away, sold or transferred any assets such as: a home, land, personal property, life insurance policies, annuities, bank accounts, certificates of deposit, stocks, IRA, bonds or a right to income?

Within the past 60 months, have you or your spouse transferred any assets into a trust?

If yes to either question, explain circumstances…

Note that the law requires disclosure of transfers made by the applicant or his or her spouse.

Does every transfer during the look-back period make me ineligible? No. Whether you will be ineligible for benefits depends on a number of things such as the amount of the transfer and to whom it was made. We will explore this issue in more detail in a future blog post.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Medicaid Planning | Comments Off

Medicaid benefits increase January 1

A number of important Medicaid figures will increase as of January 1, 2012.

Most of the changes are figures that are typically adjusted every January. (Others change July 1, October 1, or at a lesser interval.)

Many reflect a 3.6% cost-of-living increase, the first since 2009.

One change is Pennsylvania’s penalty divisor, which will now be $8,112.13/month or $266.70/day. The penalty divisor is a figure used to calculate how long a Medicaid applicant will be ineligible for making a gift made during the look-back period. It is based on the state’s calculation of the average cost of nursing home care in Pennsylvania.

Figures for the community spouse resource allowance (CSRA) also increased. The new minimum is $22,728 and the new maximum is $113,640.

The monthly maintenance needs allowance (MMNA) has a new maximum figure of $2,841/month. The minimum MMNA gets adjusted in July.

Other new figures affect aspects of Medicaid that are more technical, and are mainly of interest to caseworkers, elder law attorneys, and others who work with Medicaid cases regularly:

Home maintenance deduction:  $720.10 (6 month limit)

Income figure to determine resource limit ($2,400 or $8,000):  $2,094/month

Excess home equity limit: $525,000

All these figures have been added to our complete list of current Medicaid figures, which you can always find on our website.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Are kids liable for Mom & Dad’s nursing home bill?

You may be surprised to learn that Pennsylvania law provides that the spouse, parent, or child of an indigent person has “the responsibility to care for and maintain or financially assist” that person, and that this responsibility applies “regardless of whether the indigent person is a public charge.”

(There are two exceptions. A child is not liable for support of a parent who abandoned the child for 10 years while the child was a minor. No person is liable under this law if there is a financial inability to pay support.)

Before you panic, though, keep in mind that the state of Pennsylvania does not generally bring support actions against family members whose relatives have run out of money and qualify for benefits. (Whether the law would even be enforceable for that purpose is questionable.) Medicaid, veterans benefits, and other public benefits regularly assist in paying for long term care for seniors who lack the ability to pay.

But Pennsylvania’s support law has been used by nursing homes and assisted living facilities to hold family members responsible for the cost of care in certain circumstances.

One important factor is whether Mom or Dad reside in a nursing facility that is certified to receive Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement. Under the federal Nursing Home Reform Act, such a facility may not require someone other than the resident (such as a family member) to guarantee payment. A facility may require someone who has access to the resident’s income or resources to sign a contract to make payment from the resident’s assets, but such a person incurs no personal financial liability.

Facilities that are not certified for Medicare or Medicaid, such as personal care or assisted living facilities, have successfully sought payment from family members. In 2009, for example, Allegheny County Judge Stanton Wettick allowed an assisted living facility to bring a lawsuit against a son of one of its residents for payment under Pennsylvania’s support law. (To read opinion, click here and find page 284.)

Another important factor is whether a family member has signed any kind of agreement to be a “responsible party” (or some similar term) for payment. Such agreements are not always enforced by the courts, but facilities sometimes use them to insist on payment from the signer.

When helping a relative with admission to a long term care facility, be sure you understand your possible liability to help make payments. An elder law attorney can help you review admission contracts and discuss the financial responsibility you may incur.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Elder Law - General, Medicaid Planning | Comments Off

“Assisted living” in Pennsylvania: terminology confusion ahead

What does “assisted living” mean in Pennsylvania now?

It’s getting harder for consumers to know.

When I have visited assisted living facilities in the past year, I have been struck by the wide variation in the services offered. One place may offer a narrow range of services and expect its residents to be nearly independent, while another may keep residents who require help with most activities of daily living.

New regulations that took effect in the state in January appeared, at first, to offer a solution. Licensed “assisted living” facilities would have to offer certain core services. Facilities would also have to provide, or arrange for, certain “supplemental health care services” which would be “packaged, contracted and priced separately from the resident agreement.” Thus, consumers could compare facilities and prices more transparently.

A licensed facility would also have to meet certain requirements in its physical site, staffing, and training. So if you moved into a licensed assisted living facility, you would generally know what you were going to get.

But the regulations would only apply to a facility that chose to use the term “assisted living” in its name or written materials.

Regulators expected hundreds of facilities to apply but few have, according to a news report. Gary Rotstein of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette has reported that state officials predicted there would be at least 150 assisted living residences licensed by now, but there are only 10 (with only one in Western Pennsylvania). Since facilities fall under the new regulations only if they describe themselves to consumers using the term “assisted living,” it seems many are choosing to avoid that term and thereby escape the regulatory requirements, the article said.

These developments are a sure-fire recipe for confusion.

Consumers know the well-branded term “assisted living” as a place where a person can receive help with activities of daily living in a home-like setting, instead of going to a nursing home. But where can a person find that service? The 10 licensed facilities cannot possibly serve the demand in Pennsylvania. People will be unsure if what used to be called the XYZ Assisted Living Residence is providing the same service now that it’s called the XYZ Personal Care Residence. Terms like “personal care” are so vague that many consumers may not know what services the facility offers.  

When the regulations went into effect in January, it was hoped they would give meaning to the term “assisted living” and help consumers find the services they need. Now it appears the use of that term may become increasingly rare and consumers will be left to wonder what services are offered at which facilities, and where they can find the right mix of help they need.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Aging, Elder Law - General | Comments Off

What is a “self-proved” or “self-proving” will in Pennsylvania?

If you’re the executor of an estate, you want to be able to walk into the register of wills office, present the original will (along with other required materials), get sworn in, obtain the documents you need, and walk out ready to start settling the estate.

A “self-proved” or “self-proving” will is going to help.

If you are doing your estate planning now, make things easier for your executor by signing a will that is self-proved. (I will discuss how shortly.)

Background

To make a valid will in Pennsylvania, you must put it in writing and sign it at the end. If you can only make an “x” or some other mark instead of signing, two witnesses must be present and must also sign their names to the will in your presence. If you can’t sign or even make a mark, you can authorize someone else to sign for you, but again, you must have two witnesses who also sign their names to the will in your presence.

In order for the will to be accepted by the register of wills to open an estate, Pennsylvania law requires that the will be “proved by the oaths or affirmations of two competent witnesses.”

So if you had simply signed your will in front of two witnesses, those witnesses could appear at the register of wills office and swear under oath that they did indeed watch you sign that will. But what an inconvenience for the witnesses!

And what if you signed the will 30 years before you died? Will the witnesses still remember? Are they still alive? Can they be found? If not, can someone else swear that they recognize your signature on the will?

Self-proved will

A self-proved (sometimes called “self-proving”) will solves this problem.

If the will contains certain acknowledgements and affidavits, the register of wills shall accept the will without the need of witnesses to the signature.

Here is an example of an acknowledgement and affidavit that would be acceptable under Pennsylvania law:

When it won’t be accepted

There are three situations in which the register of wills would not accept a self-proved will:

1. When the validity of the will is being contested;

2. When the will is signed by mark; and

3. When the will is signed by someone else (as described above in the first paragraph under Background).

In these situations, you’ll need to have witnesses appear or submit sworn statements.

Execution

Finally, it’s important to remember that to make an effective self-proved will, the document must be executed correctly.

You’re not required to use the services of an attorney, but a qualified attorney can often help you make sure your will is drafted and executed properly.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Estate Administration, Estate Planning | Comments Off

Doctors: Can you tell the family when a patient needs a guardian?

Let’s suppose you are a doctor, or other similar health care provider. Every time you see your patient Joe his memory has worsened.

Joe struggles to recall whether he took his medications this morning, and if so, what they were. He used to ask about your children, but now he seems not to recognize you. Yesterday he left his coat – containing his wallet and keys – in the waiting room. 

You believe Joe now needs someone to look after him.

Can you tell the family?

If a family member or friend of Joe’s calls to ask whether you think he needs a guardian, can you answer the question?

Thankfully, the regulations under HIPAA (the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) provide an answer.

In certain circumstances, HIPAA allows a health care provider to furnish information relevant to a patient’s care to “a family member, other relative, or a close personal friend” of the patient, or to “any other person identified” by the patient for involvement in health care matters.

One circumstance appropriate for such disclosure is when the patient agrees to disclosure, or at least does not object when provided the opportunity. For example, if Joe brings his caregiver daughter to his appointment, he may agree to let you discuss his condition with her.

A health care provider may also make this type of disclosure if the patient is unable to agree to disclosure “because of the individual’s incapacity” and the provider determines that “disclosure is in the best interests of the individual.” In that case, disclosure may be made even if the patient is not present and has not agreed.

In either of these circumstances, the provider may “disclose only the protected health information that is directly relevant to the person’s involvement with the [patient]’s health care.”

(The regulation discussing these circumstances may be found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 45 C.F.R. §164.510(b).)

You can therefore tell an appropriate person in Joe’s life that you believe Joe can no longer make and communicate decisions effectively and is unable to manage his financial resources or meet essential requirements for his physical health and safety.

So HIPAA not only protects Joe’s patient information when he has all his mental faculties, but also allows his doctor to notify an appropriate person when Joe has lost capacity and needs guardianship.

When you see Joe next, you may have more peace of mind knowing that someone else is in charge of his finances and health care decisions.   

A version of this blog post originally appeared in the Western Pennsylvania Hospital News.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Aging, Elder Law - General, Estate Planning | Comments Off

A pet trust for Fluffy

You don’t have to be Leona Helmsley to set up a trust for a beloved pet.

After the billionaire Helmsley’s death, her white Maltese lived in the lap of luxury on its multi-million dollar trust fund. But Pennsylvania law allows people of even modest means to provide for a dog, cat, or other animal that is as dear as a family member (or, let’s face it, more dear than that nephew who drops by only when he needs help paying his bar tab).

Suppose you’re concerned about Fluffy, who greets you with wild tail-wagging each morning, listens attentively to everything you say, and never talks back. What will become of Fluffy when you die or go to a nursing home? Who will walk him and buy him his favorite smoked pig ears?

In recent years, Pennsylvania joined about 40 other states that have passed laws to make pet trusts valid and enforceable. Such statutes are important because pets (otherwise considered property by law) cannot inherit from their owners.

Under a pet trust, you give Fluffy, along with enough money to pay for his care, to a trustee. The trustee, usually a trusted friend or bank, has a duty to arrange for the proper care of the pet according to your instructions.

You can establish a pet trust for Fluffy during your lifetime (called an “inter vivos” trust), or by means of a clause in your will.

One advantage of an inter vivos trust is that it can go into effect as soon as you become unable to care for your pet. A clause found only in your will may not be discovered until after Fluffy has gone hungry or been given away.

Your pet trust should contain specific instructions about Fluffy’s care, such as the type and amount of food (and any specific brands) he eats, medical care (including preferred veterinarian), grooming needs, daily routine, favorite treats, toys, and so on.

Determine who the trust should name as Fluffy’s caretaker. The trustee will deliver Fluffy to the caretaker for care according to your instructions.

Check to make sure the caretaker you name is willing to take on the responsibility. That will put you one step ahead of Leona Helmsley, whose proposed caretaker reportedly had no interest in the post. Be sure to name a substitute caretaker in case your first choice dies, or is unable to provide care.

You can fund the trust up front, or provide for funding through a bequest in your will. The funds can come from your estate, or from some other arrangement such as life insurance, a “pay on death” account, annuity, or retirement plan. Depending on your pet’s needs, the trust may require as little as $200 to $2,000 a year.

If you set up an inter vivos trust, you may also need to change your will to make reference to the trust and perhaps provide additional funding.  

Under Pennsylvania law, the trust lasts until the end of your pet’s lifetime. If you have set up the trust for more than one pet, it will last until the death of the last surviving animal. Any remaining funds will then return to you, if you’re still alive, or can pass to a beneficiary you name.

You will probably also want to leave instructions about disposition of the pet’s remains after its death, such as burial or cremation. 

An attorney knowledgeable about estate planning, and pet trusts in particular, can help you set up a pet trust that complies with Pennsylvania’s trust laws.

Fluffy might not eat hand-fed meals from a silver serving set like the Helmsley dog, but you can rest easy knowing Fluffy will have his smoked pig ears even when you’re gone.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Estate Planning, Trusts | Comments Off

What is a “third party” special needs trust?

When someone uses his or her own money to set up a special needs trust (SNT for short) for another person, that’s called a “third party” SNT.

It’s the best kind of SNT for two reasons.

First, unlike a “first party” or “self settled” SNT (established with the beneficiary’s own funds) a third party SNT does not have to be a “payback” trust. A first party SNT must provide that when the beneficiary dies, any remaining funds in the trust have to go to the state to pay back any Medicaid costs paid for the beneficiary. Only after the SNT pays back those costs can any remaining funds go to other beneficiaries.

But a third part SNT can leave remaining funds to others with no payback requirement.

Here’s an example. Mary has one disabled child, Eric, and two others who are not disabled. She decides to leave, say, $100,000 to Eric. If Mary leaves the money to Eric outright, he could arrange to have it placed into a payback trust. If $40,000 remained in that trust when Eric died, the rest would go first to pay back any Medicaid costs the state paid for Eric while he was alive. If there was anything left after paying the state, the remainder could go to Mary’s other two children.

But if Mary’s will established a SNT for Eric, that would qualify as a third party trust. If $40,000 remained when he died, the entire amount could pass to Mary’s other two children.

 Second, a third party SNT is easier to establish. A competent person wishing to establish a SNT for another person can simply sign the trust document.

On the other hand, a person wishing to set up a first party SNT with his or her own money cannot just go ahead and do that. For some unknown reason, the law requires a parent, grandparent, legal guardian, or court to establish the trust for such a person. That requirement can pose a difficult hurdle, and require additional legal expense, if the parents and grandparents are deceased or incapacitated, or there is no legal guardian.

Third party trusts require advance planning, but they’re worth it.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Special Needs Trusts | Comments Off
615 washington road  suite 304  pittsburgh, pa 15228  412.531.7123
MEMBER National Academy
of Elder Law Attorneys, Inc..
|